I've been searching and searching the forums. I could've sworn I've seen someone exemplify this somewhere but I just can't find it. I'm starting to believe I've dreamed it.

Here's what I want to do in pseudocode:

IF x1
 THEN Blah1

ELSE IF x2
 THEN Blah2

ELSE IF x1 AND x2
 THEN Blah3

Did I actually dream this is possible?
Like I said; I can't find anything about it and when I try to make it work in codeview I... well... can't.

If you do that, Quest looks at the first if statement. Is x1 true? Yes, it is. So do Blah1, and ignore the rest of the 'else' clauses.

If you want it to work, you need to do either make the first test explicit:

IF x1 and not x2
 THEN Blah1

ELSE IF x2 and not x1
 THEN Blah2

ELSE IF x1 AND x2
 THEN Blah3

OR put the most specific case first

IF x1 AND x2
 THEN Blah3

ELSE IF x1
 THEN Blah1

ELSE IF x2
 THEN Blah2

Thanks MrAngel! Now I know it's possible.
One thing:
What would the actual code look like? Been trying and trying but it just won't come out right :(

I get this

Error running script: Error compiling expression 'cane.here and GetBoolean(knob, "polished")': AndOrElement: Operation 'And' is not defined for types 'Object' and 'Boolean'

From this

if (cane.here and GetBoolean(knob, "polished"))

Been trying to move stuff around but the result is always the same... an error message.

"and" requires two booleans (true/false values).
From the error message, it looks like cane.here is an object rather than a boolean.

In error messages like than, "Object" most often means the special object null. As in, the attribute cane.here hasn't been set yet. That's precisely the problem that GetBoolean was made for.

In that case, it would be safer to use:
if (GetBoolean(cane, "here") and GetBoolean(knob, "polished")) {

Thanks a bunch mrangel, it's sorted now! (and I learned stuff too) :)